- Visibility 108 Views
- Downloads 146 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.jmra.46029.1758703239
-
CrossMark
The pink tax in India: Empirical evidence of gender-based pricing disparities in retail markets
- Author Details:
-
Ashok Kumar Panigrahi *
-
Lucky Ansari
Ashok Kumar Panigrahi *
This study investigates gender-based pricing disparities—commonly termed the “Pink Tax”—within Indian retail markets. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analysed 52 matched product pairs across personal care, apparel, children’s items, recreational goods, and healthcare products from major online and offline retailers, alongside survey responses from 500 urban consumers. Statistical tests revealed that female-oriented products were priced on average 19.4% higher than comparable male-oriented variants (p < 0.001), with personal care items showing the largest markup (24.2%). While consumer awareness of this phenomenon was limited (72% uninformed), disclosure strongly influenced attitudes, with 84% of respondents expressing dissatisfaction and 91% supporting transparency mandates. The findings highlight significant economic disadvantages for women, with estimated lifetime costs of ₹2.1–2.8 lakhs per consumer, and underscore the urgent need for policy interventions, regulatory oversight, and corporate accountability. By providing the first systematic empirical evidence on gendered pricing in India, this research fills a critical gap in consumer protection literature and contributes to ongoing debates on market fairness and equity.
References
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Consumer Protection Council of India. (2022). Annual consumer rights violation report. CPCI Publications. Available From: https://www.jsalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Annual- Consumer-Protection-Compendium-2023.pdf
- European Consumer Organisation. Gender-based pricing across European markets. BEUC Publications. 2019 Available From: https://www.beuc.eu/sites/default/files/publications/BEUC-X- 2023-097_Price_personalisation.pdf
- Johnson M, Davis R. Service sector price discrimination: Evidence from the dry-cleaning industry. J Consumer Pol. 2018;41(3):234–
- Miller S, Washington L. Beauty industry pricing disparities: A comprehensive analysis. Consumer Affairs Quarter, 2017;28(4):112–8.
- New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. From cradle to cane: The cost of being a female consumer. NYC DCA Office of Research. 2015.
- Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage 2015. p. 638.
- Sharma A., Patel K. Preliminary analysis of gender-based pricing in Indian retail markets. Indian J Consumer Stud, 2015;15(2):45–
- Strack F, Mussweiler T. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. J Personal Soc Psychol, 1997;73(3):437–46.
- Turner JC, Hogg MA., Oakes PJ, Reicher SD. &. Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Basil Blackwell. 1987
- Varian HR. Price discrimination. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organisation 1989;1: 597–654.